Main Article Content

Abstract

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic did not only surprise many but also caught most of the academic institutions unprepared. As such, the best option to continue the academic year is to go distance education through flexible learning modes. However, several issues are tied to the implementation of the different modes of learning. To find the most appropriate materials in teaching, this study tried to assess the voice of the learners as one of the considerations in the learning system. Using a descriptive method in which the textual responses from 130 English Major Students were converted to quantitative data to establish patterns and qualitative response analysis to capture the implications of the participants’ responses, the researchers analyzed the proposals of the pre-service teachers and their implications to teaching and learning. Findings reveal that the participants implicitly based their preferences on some considerations. Hence, the diversified instructional materials imply their capability and willingness to use various sources and are in favor of engaging in the hybrid form of instructions. Results also indicate that teachers’ preparations should be parallel to the preferences of the learners to meet the demands of the new normal teaching set up.

Article Details

How to Cite
Besa, L. M., & Parcon , R. E. (2021). On Instructional Materials: The Pre-Service Teachers Preferences in Time of Pandemic. Basic and Applied Education Research Journal, 2(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.11594/baerj.02.01.04

References

Tria JZ (2020) The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1:ep2001. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311
UNESCO (2020) COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. [https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse], Feb 3, 2021.
Ainin S, Naqshbandi MM, Moghavvemi S, Jaafar NI (2015) Facebook sage, socialization and academic performance. Comput Educ. 83:64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.018
Gagne M, Shepherd MG (2001) Distance learning in accounting: A comparison between distance and traditional graduate accounting class. T.H.E. Journal. 28:58-60.
DepEd. Official Statement Department of Education. [https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/05/06/official-statement-2], Feb 3, 2021.
CHED. CHED COVID-19 advisory no. 3. [https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/CHED-COVID-2019-Advisory.No.3.pdf], Feb 3, 2021.
Adelowo AG, Babatunde A (2015) Instructional resources as determinants of english language performance of secondary school high-achiving students in Ibadan, Oyo State. Journal of Education and Practice. 6:195-200.
Niglas K (2009) How the novice researcher can make sense of mixed methods designs. Int J Mult Res Approaches. 3:34-46. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.3.1.34
Panchabakesan S (2011) Problems and prospective in distance educatin in India in the 21st. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 30:113-122.
Tavukcu T, Arapa I, Ozcan D (2011) General overview on distance education concept. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 15:3999–4004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.404
Owens J, Hardcastle L, Richardson B (2009) Learning from a distance: The experience of remote students. Journal of Distance Education Revue De L’éducation À Distance, 23:53-74.
Salmon G (2014) Learning innovation: A framework for transformation. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 17:219-235. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0031
Shahabadia M, Uplaneb M (2015) Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 176:129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453
Perveen A (2016) Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis. 8:21-39.
Parsad B, Lewis L (2008) Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2006–07 (NCES 2009–044). Washington, DC.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. [https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009044.pdf], Feb 3, 2021.
Islam S, Hasan A (2016). Use of technology in open and distance education: A guideline for the Educational Institutions in Bangladesh. International Journal of Applied Information Systems.10:1-5.
Bandalaria M dela P (2007). Impacts of ICTs on open and distance learning in a developing country setting: The Philippine experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 8: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.334
Hrastinki S (2008) Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly. 31:51-55.
Murphy E, Rodriguez-Manzanares MA, Barbour M (2011) Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of canadian high school distance education teachers. Br J Educ Technol. 42:583-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x